Starheb
Blog Archive
►
2013
(7)
►
October
(1)
►
July
(1)
►
June
(5)
►
2012
(49)
►
December
(2)
►
October
(10)
►
March
(33)
►
February
(4)
►
2011
(21)
►
December
(2)
►
July
(1)
►
June
(6)
►
May
(2)
►
April
(1)
►
March
(2)
►
February
(4)
►
January
(3)
►
2010
(120)
►
December
(7)
►
November
(3)
►
October
(10)
►
September
(7)
►
August
(12)
►
July
(3)
►
June
(13)
►
May
(13)
►
April
(16)
►
March
(10)
►
February
(15)
►
January
(11)
▼
2009
(111)
►
December
(7)
▼
October
(23)
Symbolic Politics
Trying to be too generous to the "other side"
Shockingly, it's not JUST the insurers who are greedy
How to hire folks
Welfare for every one I guess
Smoking Bans and science
Another marvelous Camille Paglia mailbag
I agree with Robert Reich
Why does this surprise anybody?
Heh
This disturbs me a bit
Thoughts on the 17th amendment
I guess we'll have to try something different.....
Finally, a use for Twitter
Scalia, at his provocative best
Nice boys and their (over) thinking
Humor and Economics
Oh, so true
Wow!
Health Care spending and what it gets us
Walmart Medicine
Twitteleh
ACORN
►
September
(11)
►
August
(12)
►
July
(11)
►
June
(3)
►
May
(6)
►
April
(8)
►
March
(7)
►
February
(12)
►
January
(11)
►
2008
(93)
►
December
(8)
►
November
(31)
►
October
(15)
►
September
(18)
►
August
(21)
About Me
Daniel Schwanke
View my complete profile
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Scalia, at his provocative best
Do we have too many
lawyers
, or too many
laws
? Personally I think it's probably more option two, which has more to do with
us
as a society, then the lawyers themselves. Even if they do seemingly run the world, at least the "Civilized" part of it.
Newer Post
Older Post
Home