Starheb

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (7)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (5)
  • ►  2012 (49)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  March (33)
    • ►  February (4)
  • ►  2011 (21)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ▼  2010 (120)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ▼  October (10)
      • Doctor's pay
      • The cognitive elite
      • Wikileaks and Iraq
      • Special Interests
      • Louis Brandeis' jurisprudence
      • Child Protective Services
      • Work, Tax, and Incentives
      • something to keep in mind
      • Was lack of regulation the cause?
      • Fun, random pictures
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (13)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (10)
    • ►  February (15)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2009 (111)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  October (23)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2008 (93)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  November (31)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (21)

About Me

My photo
Daniel Schwanke
View my complete profile

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Child Protective Services

What are they good for? Absolutely nothing. But, given the article was written in the NY Times, of course, the author of the article calls for more government action/power. Sigh
Posted by Daniel Schwanke at 7:24 PM
Labels: government power
Newer Post Older Post Home